AI Management System (AIMS) Explained
An AI Management System (AIMS) is the framework of policies, processes, and controls an organization uses to manage AI responsibly. ISO 42001 provides the structure for building and certifying your AIMS.
Key Takeaways
| Point | Summary |
|---|---|
| Definition | Interrelated elements for establishing AI policy, objectives, and processes to achieve them |
| Core purpose | Responsible development, provision, and use of AI systems |
| Foundation | ISO High-Level Structure (compatible with ISO 27001, ISO 9001) |
| Key components | Leadership, planning, support, operations, performance evaluation, improvement |
| Required documentation | AI policy, risk assessments, Statement of Applicability, procedures, records |
| Continuous improvement | Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle embedded in the system |
Quick Answer: An AIMS is your organization's management framework for responsible AI. It includes policies, processes, controls, and documentation that together ensure AI systems are developed, deployed, and used in a way that manages risks and delivers intended benefits.
What is a Management System?
A management system is a set of interrelated elements used to establish policy and objectives, and achieve those objectives. For AI, this means:
| Element | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Policy | What we commit to regarding AI |
| Objectives | What we're trying to achieve |
| Processes | How we do things |
| Procedures | Specific steps to follow |
| Resources | People, tools, infrastructure |
| Documentation | Records and evidence |
| Monitoring | Checking we're achieving objectives |
| Improvement | Getting better over time |
AIMS vs ISMS
If you're familiar with ISO 27001's Information Security Management System (ISMS), the AIMS follows a similar structure:
| ISMS (ISO 27001) | AIMS (ISO 42001) | |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Information security | AI management |
| Risk scope | CIA (Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability) | AI-specific risks (bias, transparency, data quality) |
| Controls | Annex A (93 controls) | Annex A (39 controls) |
| Assets | Information assets | AI systems |
| Structure | ISO High-Level Structure | ISO High-Level Structure |
AIMS Components
Governance Structure
AIMS Governance Structure
────────────────────────────────────────────────────
┌─────────────────┐
│ Top Management│
│ (Clause 5.1) │
└────────┬────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────┐
│ AIMS Owner │
│ (Clause 5.3) │
└────────┬────────┘
│
┌─────────────────┼─────────────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐
│ Risk │ │ Control │ │ Process │
│ Owners │ │ Owners │ │ Owners │
└──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘
Core Clauses (4-10)
ISO 42001 follows the ISO High-Level Structure:
| Clause | Title | Key Requirements |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Context of the organization | Internal/external issues, interested parties, AIMS scope |
| 5 | Leadership | Management commitment, AI policy, roles and responsibilities |
| 6 | Planning | Risk assessment, AI objectives, planning for changes |
| 7 | Support | Resources, competence, awareness, communication, documentation |
| 8 | Operation | AI risk assessment, AI system impact assessment, life cycle management |
| 9 | Performance evaluation | Monitoring, internal audit, management review |
| 10 | Improvement | Nonconformity, corrective action, continual improvement |
Clause-by-Clause Overview
Clause 4: Context of the Organization
Understanding your organization's context is the foundation:
| Requirement | What to Document |
|---|---|
| 4.1 External/internal issues | Regulatory environment, market conditions, organizational culture |
| 4.2 Interested parties | Customers, regulators, employees, affected individuals |
| 4.3 AIMS scope | Which AI systems, which parts of organization |
| 4.4 AIMS | How the system is structured |
Scope definition example:
"The AI Management System covers the development and provision of AI-powered analytics services, including data ingestion, model training, deployment, and customer support. The scope includes the Engineering, Data Science, and Customer Success teams operating from the headquarters location and cloud infrastructure."
Clause 5: Leadership
Management commitment and governance:
| Requirement | Key Activities |
|---|---|
| 5.1 Leadership and commitment | Executive sponsorship, resource allocation, integration with business |
| 5.2 AI policy | Establish and communicate AI governance policy |
| 5.3 Organizational roles | Assign AIMS responsibilities and authorities |
AI Policy should address:
- Commitment to responsible AI
- Compliance with applicable requirements
- Framework for setting AI objectives
- Commitment to continual improvement
- Communication to relevant parties
Clause 6: Planning
Planning addresses risks and objectives:
| Requirement | Activities |
|---|---|
| 6.1 Actions to address risks and opportunities | AI risk assessment, risk treatment |
| 6.2 AI objectives and planning | Set measurable objectives, plan to achieve them |
AI risk assessment considerations:
- Risks related to AI system development
- Risks related to AI system provision/use
- Risks to individuals affected by AI decisions
- Organizational risks (reputation, liability, compliance)
- Opportunities from AI (business value, efficiency)
Clause 7: Support
Resources and enablers:
| Requirement | Focus |
|---|---|
| 7.1 Resources | People, infrastructure, tools for AI management |
| 7.2 Competence | Required skills for AI roles |
| 7.3 Awareness | Ensure personnel understand AIMS requirements |
| 7.4 Communication | Internal and external communication about AI |
| 7.5 Documented information | Create and control AIMS documentation |
Competence areas for AI teams:
- AI/ML technical skills
- Responsible AI practices
- Risk management
- Data governance
- Relevant domain knowledge
Clause 8: Operation
Core operational requirements for AI:
| Requirement | Activities |
|---|---|
| 8.1 Operational planning and control | Plan and control AI processes |
| 8.2 AI risk assessment | Assess risks for AI systems |
| 8.3 AI risk treatment | Address identified risks |
| 8.4 AI system impact assessment | Evaluate impacts on individuals and society |
AI System Impact Assessment (Clause 8.4):
| Step | Activities |
|---|---|
| Identify | Affected individuals and groups |
| Assess | Potential impacts (positive and negative) |
| Evaluate | Severity and likelihood |
| Determine | Mitigation measures |
| Document | Assessment results and decisions |
| Review | Periodic reassessment |
Clause 9: Performance Evaluation
Measuring AIMS effectiveness:
| Requirement | Activities |
|---|---|
| 9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis | Track AIMS and AI system performance |
| 9.2 Internal audit | Verify AIMS conformity and effectiveness |
| 9.3 Management review | Executive review of AIMS performance |
What to monitor:
- AI system performance metrics
- Risk treatment effectiveness
- Objective achievement
- Incident trends
- Stakeholder feedback
- Control effectiveness
Clause 10: Improvement
Continuous improvement mechanisms:
| Requirement | Activities |
|---|---|
| 10.1 Continual improvement | Enhance AIMS suitability, adequacy, effectiveness |
| 10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action | Address problems and prevent recurrence |
AIMS Documentation
Required Documents
ISO 42001 requires specific documented information:
| Document | Clause Reference |
|---|---|
| AIMS scope | 4.3 |
| AI policy | 5.2 |
| AI risk assessment process and results | 6.1 |
| AI objectives | 6.2 |
| Statement of Applicability | Annex A |
| AI system impact assessment | 8.4 |
| Internal audit results | 9.2 |
| Management review results | 9.3 |
| Nonconformities and corrective actions | 10.2 |
Documentation Hierarchy
AIMS Documentation Structure
────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Level 1: AI Policy
└── Strategic direction, commitments
Level 2: Procedures
├── AI risk assessment procedure
├── AI system impact assessment procedure
├── AI development procedure
└── Incident management procedure
Level 3: Standards and Guidelines
├── Data quality standards
├── Model documentation standards
└── Testing standards
Level 4: Records and Evidence
├── Risk assessments
├── Impact assessments
├── Training records
└── Audit reports
Statement of Applicability
The Statement of Applicability (SoA) documents which Annex A controls apply:
| Control | Applicable | Justification | Implementation |
|---|---|---|---|
| A.2.2 AI policy | Yes | Required | Full |
| A.5.2 AI system risk assessment | Yes | Core requirement | Full |
| A.7.3 Data quality for ML | Yes | Train models on data | Partial |
| A.6.2.7 Retirement of AI systems | No | No systems retired yet | N/A |
Building Your AIMS
Phase 1: Establish Foundation (Weeks 1-3)
| Task | Output |
|---|---|
| Executive commitment | Sponsorship letter |
| Define scope | Scope document |
| Assign AIMS owner | Appointment |
| Identify interested parties | Stakeholder register |
| Gap assessment | Current state analysis |
Phase 2: Develop Framework (Weeks 3-6)
| Task | Output |
|---|---|
| Create AI policy | Approved policy document |
| Define roles and responsibilities | RACI matrix |
| Establish risk assessment methodology | Risk methodology document |
| Conduct initial risk assessment | Risk register |
| Draft Statement of Applicability | SoA document |
Phase 3: Implement Controls (Weeks 6-12)
| Task | Output |
|---|---|
| Implement Annex A controls | Operational controls |
| Create procedures | Procedure documents |
| Deploy tools | Configured systems |
| Train personnel | Training records |
| Begin evidence collection | Evidence repository |
Phase 4: Verify and Improve (Weeks 12-16)
| Task | Output |
|---|---|
| Conduct internal audit | Audit report |
| Management review | Review minutes |
| Address findings | Corrective actions |
| Prepare for certification | Audit-ready AIMS |
AIMS Integration
With ISO 27001
If you have an existing ISMS, integrate your AIMS:
| Area | Integration Approach |
|---|---|
| Policy | Extend information security policy to cover AI |
| Risk assessment | Add AI-specific risks to existing process |
| Documentation | Unified document structure |
| Audits | Combined internal audits |
| Management review | Single review covering both |
With Other Systems
| Management System | Integration Points |
|---|---|
| ISO 9001 (Quality) | Shared improvement processes, documentation |
| ISO 27701 (Privacy) | AI privacy controls, data handling |
| SOC 2 | Overlapping technical controls |
Common AIMS Challenges
Challenge 1: Defining Scope
Problem: Unclear which AI systems to include
Solution:
- Start with AI systems that are core to your product/service
- Include AI that affects customers or makes decisions about individuals
- Exclude experimental/research AI initially if appropriate
Challenge 2: Risk Assessment for AI
Problem: Traditional risk methods don't capture AI-specific risks
Solution:
- Use ISO 42001 Annex C for risk sources and objectives
- Consider both technical and ethical risks
- Include impacts on individuals, not just organization
Challenge 3: Documentation Burden
Problem: Concern about excessive documentation
Solution:
- Right-size documentation to organization
- Automate evidence collection where possible
- Integrate with existing documentation
Challenge 4: Competence
Problem: Team lacks AIMS experience
Solution:
- Training for key personnel
- External expertise for implementation
- Build competence over time
Need help building your AI Management System? Talk to our team
